Today and yesterday have been amazing for SICP checkins. I've finished 17 problems in the last 48 hours! Here's my answer to the last problem in chapter 1:

`;;;; 1.46 ;; ...Write a procedure /iterative-improve/ that takes two procedures as ;; arguments: a method for telling whether a guess is good enough and a method ;; for improving a guess. /Iterative-improve/ should return as its value a ;; procedure that takes a guess as argument and keeps improving the guess ;; until it is good enough. Rewrite the /sqrt/ procedure of section 1.1.7 and ;; the /fixed-point/ procedure of section 1.3.3 in terms of ;; /iterative-improve/. (define iterative-improve (lambda (good-enough? improve) (letrec ((improver (lambda (guess) (if (good-enough? guess) guess (improver (improve guess)))))) (lambda (guess) (improver guess))))) (define sqrt-using-iterative-improve (lambda (x) (define (improve guess) (average guess (/ x guess))) (define (good-enough? guess) (< (abs (- (square guess) x)) 0.001)) ((iterative-improve good-enough? improve) 1.0))) (define fixed-point-using-iterative-improve (lambda (f first-guess) (define (next guess) (f guess)) (define (close-enough? guess) (< (abs (- guess (next guess))) tolerance)) ((iterative-improve close-enough? next) first-guess)))`

I just love writing stuff that looks like this, especially `iterative-improve`

. Why write code that does something when you can write code that does anything? Whee!

There's just one problem left to finish -- the second half of this one. It's sticky, but I think I can get it done before the start of ICFP. You know, even if the contest is a wash, I'll feel good going into it knowing I can do all the exercises in the first chapter of this book. I feel so much stronger than I did four months ago.